 |
Positive Feedback ISSUE 56
july/august
2011
 |
Vinyl Reissue of
Columbia MS 6043
by Roger S. Gordon

Impex Records reissue
of Columbia MS 6043 – Shostakovitch Piano
Concerto No. 2 with the New York Philharmonic and
Ravel Piano Concerto in G Major with the Columbia
Symphony Orchestra, Leonard Bernstein conducting
both works from the piano.
Many vinyl lovers are
familiar with Cisco Music. For twenty years Cisco
reissued music from many genres of music on 180 gram
vinyl, on Gold CDs, on SACDS, and on regular CDs. They also imported direct from Japan the 180 gram
Super Analogue Disc LPs. These LPs were primarily
reissues of classical music off of the London
(Decca) label. While a small company, Cisco Music
was well known and respected in the audiophile
reissue business. At the start of what the media is
now calling “The Great Recession” Cisco, like many
other High End companies, suffered a severe drop in
revenues. Rather than trying to endure the
financial losses Cisco closed its doors. Like a
phoenix arising from the ashes of Cisco Music, comes Impex Records, Inc. All of the key personnel from
Cisco are now the key employees of Impex Records. Impex Records is currently pressing and selling some
of the LPs from the final Cisco catalog. In
addition to reissuing some of the old Cisco catalog, Impex is starting to release new reissues of
recordings that have never been reissued. One of
these new, never before reissued, LPs is Columbia MS
6043.
When I heard that MS
6043 was going to be reissued I was elated. In the
heyday of stereo analog recordings (roughly 1954 to
1983) there were four recordings of the Ravel and
two recordings of the Shostakovitch that stood above
all others in terms of performance. MS 6043
contains two of those six great performances.
As soon as I got my
hands on the Impex Records reissue of MS 6043 I
fired up the stereo and pulled my original Columbia
first pressing (six eye) of MS 6043 from the shelf
along with the other four great performances. I
also pulled an additional recording of the Shostakovitch that I thought would make for an
interesting comparison. For the Shostakovitch I
pulled EMI ASD-2709, Lawrence Foster conducting the
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra with John Ogden as
soloist with the extra LP being Angel Seraphim
60161, Andre Cluytens conducting the French National
Radio Orchestra with Dmitri Shostakovitch, the
composer, as soloist. For the Ravel I pulled EMI
ASD-255 (also available as Angel S35567), with Ettore Gracis conducting the Philharmonia Orchestra
with Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli as soloist, Decca
SXL6680/London CS 6878, Lawrence Foster conducting
the London Philharmonic Orchestra with Alicia de
Larrocha as soloist, and Deutsche Grammophon 139349
(also available as DG 664109), with Claudio Abbado
conducting the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra with
Martha Argerich as soloist.
With LPs in hand I
played the MS 6043 reissue of the Ravel. The piece
opens with a whip crack. The whip crack was loud
and startled me in my seat. I immediately reached
for the volume control thinking that the volume was
set too high. It turned out that the volume was set
correctly. It is just that the reissue is very
dynamic. The Ravel reissue was made from the
original three track masters. It is a very dry
studio recording recorded at the 30th
Street Studio that was the recording site of many
famous recordings. In this recording the piano is
front and center with the orchestra arrayed behind
it. You are sitting in row 1 and can just about
reach out and touch the piano. The recording was
crystal clear and dead quiet. Both the piano and
each solo instrument in the orchestra were highly
detailed. If you have heard the Cisco reissue of
Capitol SP 8374, Britten - Young Person's Guide to
the Orchestra and Dohnanyi - Variations on a Nursery
Tune this reissue of MS 6043 is very similar to the
Capitol in its ability to let you hear every single
detail. After playing the reissue Ravel I played
the Ravel on the original MS 6043. For a Columbia
LP the sound of the original was remarkably good. You would not mistake it for an RCA, EMI, or
Decca/London but it was very acceptable. The
original, in comparison to the reissue, was noisier
and not as detailed. The original was also warmer
in sound than the reissue. This may have been due
to the tube gear used through out the recording and
production chain. The additional warmth does make
the sound seem more natural, but it seems to obscure
some of the fine inner detail. I then played the De Larrocha Ravel, followed by the Michelangeli, the
Argerich, and finally the reissue for a second
time. Then the cycle was repeated. As the LPs
played I listened to the performances comparing them
one to the other.
The Ravel piano concerto
is not a piece that requires blazing virtuoso
technique. It is a work that requires a high level
of interpretive skills and also the ability to
recreate the sound pictures that Ravel had written. The De Larrocha Ravel was a quiet, conventional
performance which ably demonstrated De Larrocha's
superb technique and her interpretive skills. I
found it a little boring though the sound was
impeccable. The Michelangeli Ravel had a slightly
faster tempo and was more spirited, more animated
than the De Larrocha. Even in the slow, soft second
movement the quiet music came alive due to the
interpretive skills of the pianist. The final third
movement was played at a fast pace. It was a
controlled, restrained performance—no
pyrotechnics, just beautiful music. The Argerich
Ravel surprised me. I love Argerich and her mighty
left hand. For this performance, however, there was
no thundering left hand. It was a subtle and in
many ways an almost delicate performance. The first
movement was lively. In the second movement she
created an impressionistic painting of a summer
afternoon lying under a tree watching the clouds
float by. As I listened my entire body relaxed as I
drifted along with the music. The third movement
was played very fast. There was a tension
underlying the music that was not in the other
performances. This tension kept me on the edge of
my seat, riveted to the music.


The Bernstein Ravel is
quite different from the others. That is not
unusual. There is no question that Bernstein, as a
conductor, marched to a different drum. Because he
was usually pushing the envelope his performances
varied in quality. Some of his performances were
clunkers. After you heard them you immediately
thought ‘What the Heck Was He Thinking'. Then you
hear one of his legendary performances and your jaw
drops to the ground as you sit there in total awe. Bernstein's Ravel is one of those legendary
performances, though maybe not of the same magnitude
of greatness as his Stravinsky/Rite of Spring on
Columbia MS 6010. In over fifty years I have never
heard a performance, live or recorded, of the Rite
of Spring that has matched MS 6010 for primal energy
or savagery.
Ravel's Piano Concerto
in G was a favorite of Bernstein's and he had been
playing it fairly frequently with the New York
Philharmonic and its predecessor since 1944. The
first movement of Bernstein's Ravel is fast paced
with incredible energy. Towards the end of the
movement the music becomes driven forward as an
inner energy keeps building and building until it
explodes. The slow second movement reminds me of
Eric Satie's Gymnopodies. Simple music being simply
played allowing the sheer beauty of the music to
come forth. This movement more than the other two
shows to me what great skill Bernstein had as a
pianist. Lots of people can play loud and fast. It
takes talent to play something slow and simple and
make it come alive. The final movement is very fast
paced. Unlike some of Bernstein's performances
where he shoves the pedal to the metal at the finale
that does not happen here. Despite the fast pace it
is a restrained performance. The music bubbles over
with energy and excitement. Again the music builds
an inner energy that drives the music forward to the
conclusion. The final notes do not end as a mighty
crescendo. Played at a moderate volume the final
notes hang, suspended in mid air. This is a perfect
way to end this great piece of impressionistic
music.
If I could only have one
performance of the Ravel I would choose the
Bernstein for its incredible energy and the smile it
brings to my face. And yes, the audiophile quality
sound is also very nice.


Unlike the Ravel Piano
Concerto in G which is played quite often in the
concert hall, Shostakovitch's two Piano Concertos
are rarely heard. This is a shame as both concertos
are brilliant compositions. The First Piano
Concerto is very modern and it is understandable as
to why would-be concert-goers do not line up to buy
tickets. The Second Piano Concerto, which is on MS
6043, is totally different. It is written in a
classical style (think Rachmaninoff) that is readily
accessible by today's listeners. Shostakovitch's
Second Piano Concerto was used as the music in the
Toy Soldier segment of Disney's Fantasia 2000. How much more mainstream can music get than being
used in a Disney animated feature film?
When listening to the
Shostakovitch I first played the Impex reissue, then
the Seraphim with Shostakovitch as soloist, then the
EMI with John Ogden, the original Columbia MS 6043,
and then a second listen to the Impex reissue. I
repeated the cycle a second time.
The MS 6043
Shostakovitch was recorded differently from the
Ravel. The Shostakovitch is from a two track master
tape and was not recorded in a studio but in the
Colorama Ballroom of the Saint George Hotel where a
number of early Bernstein stereo recordings were
made. Because of the recording venue the recorded
sound is much more realistic; i.e. it sounds similar
to what I hear in the concert hall when I go to
concerts. You are also sitting in row 4 instead of
row 1. The recording is dead quiet. The sound is
very detailed, but not as detailed as the Ravel
because the microphones are further away from the
instruments as opposed to being on top of them. However, the instruments now blend together as an
ensemble as opposed to being separate instruments
playing simultaneously. Do you want to hear minute
detail of each instrument or do you want to hear an
orchestra playing as a whole? You can not have
both.

Hearing Shostakovitch's
mono 1957 performance is breathtaking. What many
people forget is that Shostakovitch was as brilliant
a pianist as he was a composer. This performance
shows Shostakovitch, the pianist, at his best. The
tempos of the first and third movements are
blazingly fast. It is also obvious that he was
having a lot of fun during this performance. This
piece had special meaning for him as he had written
it the previous year for his son, Maxim, to perform
in concert. Here was Dad being given a chance to
show his son how the piece should really be played.
The Ogden performance is
also fast paced, though slower than the
Shostakovitch performance. In the first movement
Ogden's playing is crisp and clean. He does not
pound the keys as some performers do. He is
forceful, but he also balances the piano's volume
against the instruments. Volume increases when
playing with the full orchestra. Volume decreases
when playing with only the piccolos. The slow
second movement is played very much in a
Rachmaninoff style—lyrical and flowing. In the
final third movement Ogden is not as forceful or as
loud as he was in the first movement. He blends in
with the orchestra, but pops out occasional to
display his virtuosity. A very well balance
performance, a very exciting performance.
The Bernstein
performance is different as the piano is much closer
to you than in the other performances. Thus, the
piano could dominate the sound, though it never
does. In the first movement where the piano and the
piccolos are playing together it sounds like
Bernstein is really pounding the keys. However, the
volume of the piccolos and the piano are perfectly
balanced. Despite Bernstein's apparent pounding of
the keys the performance of the first movement is
light and whimsical with emphasis on the jazz
elements. The slow second movement is low key. The
simple piano notes are highlighted against the back
drop of the orchestra. Bernstein plays with much
feeling. The second movement is calm and tranquil
so that you can rest up for the energetic third
movement. The third movement is fast paced. The
soloist and the orchestra are having a great time. The music is happy, fun, and witty. All too soon
the movement is over. The best way to describe this
performance is that it is really fun to listen to.
Again, if I could have
only one recording it would be the Bernstein. Both
the Impex reissue and the EMI Ogden have excellent
sound. So that is not an issue. I find the Ogden
performance to be exciting. The Bernstein, however,
is both exciting and fun. In case of tie, go with
the fun.
In conclusion, the Impex
reissue of Columbia MS 6043 has wonderful audiophile
sound and two great performances of very accessible
20th Century classical music. For
US$32.98 it is highly recommended.
Impex Records
818-535-5052
www.impexrecords.com
